Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Abortion Persuasive


Abortion, the easiest way to fix one's mistakes.  I mean, if one is

going to screw around and accidentally get knocked up, why should they

have to be responsible for the outcome of messing around.  Why not just

 murder the unborn child.  That is what goes on daily, slaughtering of

young, innocent children, that if born, would easily find a home.  What did

they [the unborn child] do wrong?  Oh nothing, it's just that the mother

and/or father are just so lazy and irresponsible that they would rather see

their child be butchered than have to change it's diaper or feed it.  Society

today does not respect life and therefore accepts the murdering of unborn

children.

      A major factor that is missing is society in today's world are moral

values.  If people actually had morals, then abortion might not occur.  No

matter what anyone argues, abortion is murder, plain and simple.  How

could one deny that when a doctor grabs his forceps and crushes a child's

skull and sucks out what was once a brain, how could they say that is

not murder, how could someone get away with doing this.  Then again

people ask that same question about OJ.

      There are many abortion-slaughter techniques that are used today. 

Examples are the Dilatation and Curettage (D&C) where a loop shaped

steel knife is inserted and the child is cut into pieces, also their is the

Dilatation and Evacuation (D&E) where the doctor uses forceps with sharp

metal jaws and tears the child apart, piece by piece.  Usually the head is

hardened to bone and must be compressed or crushed in order to get it

out.  Another highly controversial technique that is getting a lot of publicity

nowadays is the partial birth method.  This procedure in performed in the

second and third trimesters of pregnancy or between 20 to 32 weeks,

sometimes later.   Now according to  Abortion:  Some medical facts, a

book printed by the National Right to Life, the partial birth technique is

performed like this:  "Guided by ultrasound, the abortionist reaches into the

uterus, grabs the unborn baby's leg with forceps, and pulls the baby into the

birth canal, except for the head, which is deliberately kept just inside the

womb.  ( At this point in a partial -birth abortion, the baby is alive.)  Then

the abortionist jams scissors into the back of the baby's skull and

spreads the tips of the scissors apart to enlarge the wound.  After

removing the scissors, a suction catheter is inserted into the skull and the

baby's brains are sucked out.  The collapsed head is then removed from

the uterus."  Now I don't see a difference between the partial-birth method

and say me going up to someone and stabbing them over and over again. 

The only difference is the outcome, were I would be charged with murder

for committing such a crime , but the "doctors" that perform the 1.5 million

murders a year get paid and some even praised.

      Hopefully people will wake up and see that abortion truly is murder. 

The opposition usually contests that women have the right to terminate

their pregnancy whenever they want.  Now I was taught that one could not

have a right that conflicts with the rights of others, therefore the claim that

women have such a right is irrelevant.  Most uninformed people think that

the majority of  abortions are performed because the woman's life is in

danger, well that is not fact.  Fact is that 93% of all induced abortions are

done for elective, nonmedical reasons.  To make it simple, they are just

irresponsible, they are murders and will have to live with that for the rest of

their lives.
     

Abortion and the Mentally Handicapped


Abortion and the Mentally Handicapped

Ms. Smith,
      We of the Ethics Committee have reviewed your case for an extended period of time.  We took into consideration, for our decision, the yearn of any female to experience childbearing, child birth, and the joy of raising young.  Being a mother is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, and once you become a mother you are a mother for life.  There is a tremendous amount of responsibility and work that goes along with having children.  We understand your desire to continue the pregnancy, and to keep the child, but due to your legal status, mental health, and the baby's well being, the decision to terminate the pregnancy has been reached and voted for unanimously.
      Your mother has proper legal custody, and as you know, wants the abortion to take place.  We agree with her concern for your well-being.  Child birth is an extremely stressful situation.  The trauma of the pregnancy could intensify your paranoid schizophrenia, or cause some other mental disorder.  Mrs. Smith has informed us that she herself is not capable of caring for the child.  We feel that you will suffer further if you are forced to give up the child.  Your psychiatrist has come to the conclusion that you are not capable of being a responsible parent, but you are, at times, capable of making rational moral decisions.  However, because you are not able to make important, rational, moral decisions most of the time your mother can claim that you are not mentally capable of raising a child. Also. We took in to account that the father of this unborn child is unknown.  There is no one to help you make this decision, but more importantly, there is not another parental figure to aid in the raising and caring for this child.  From testimonies from your mother and your psychiatrist, it is our understanding that you can do neither on your own.
      Ms. Smith, you have been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia.  As you know, the treatment for paranoid schizophrenia is a variety of different drugs. This gives you a slightly higher chance of having fetal defects such as cystic fibrosis, pulmonary emphysema, abruptioplacentae, miscarriage, or placenta previa to name a few.  We also feel that there is an increased chance that the child will develop a mental disorder.  It is not fair for the child or its' care takers to suffer from deformities that were caused from drug reactions.  You must understand our position in caring for the physical health and safety of this child. 
      You will not be able to provide for the child, because you have no annual income.  We feel that the child will not have equal opportunities to have positive growth and development because of this.  Living in Community Hospital's long term care unit does not provide a heathy environment for the baby to live in.  The baby will have little opportunity to go outside, be with peers, and have friends. A baby needs a healthy environment to grow and be nurtured in.  This is a basic right that should be granted to any new born.  We feel that because of your living situation your baby will not get the essentials. 
      Adoption is another issue to be dealt with.  As we stated earlier, you might suffer more if you are you are forced to give the baby up for adoption.  You could possibly develop serious depression, and worsen your paranoid schizophrenia. You may think you give the child up for adoption to benefit their well being, but once you actually give birth to this child, your feelings may change. The could cause serious emotional trauma on you, your mother, and in the long run will hurt your child. Orphanages aren't the best environment for a child to grow up in.  If you did put your child up for adoption, the likelihood that someone will want to adopt a mental patient's child is low, and if the child is deformed in some way the chance is even smaller. You took the responsibility to have sex, now you must take the responsibility to do what is right for your child, no matter how much pain will be placed on you.   Every child deserves to have loving, providing parents and we feel you can't give your child that, and an adoption may not be successful. We, as an Ethics Committee are not willing to take that chance with an unborn child's life.
      Children's development is influenced by several different mediums like environment, parents, friends, and personal characteristics.  We feel that if this child were born under these circumstances, the influences presented would be negative, and the baby's well being, health, and security are top priority in this case.  Being an ethics committee, we cannot permit you to give birth to this fetus. You are not mentally capable to bear, or properly raise the child. Your lifestyle is not suitable for properly raising a child.  Living in a mental hospital does not provide an acceptable environment for a baby to grow in, and the negatives of this case out way the positives.
      We are truly sorry about this decision, but it is the best for you and the child. We will do our best to help you in any way. We are here to offer mental and physical support.  Please understand that this is the best solution for everyone involved. If you have any problems or questions feel free to contact us any time.  We did not impose this decision to hurt you in any way. We want you to get healthy and care for yourself.  Until you can care for, and have responsibility for yourself, you can't care for and take responsibility for another. This decision is final and you must cooperate with us to make this painful situation as easy as possible. We have sent a copy of this letter to your mother and to your doctors and we would like to talk with you further.  Thank You for your cooperation.

                                                                                         Sincerely,
                                                                                      The Ethics Committee

Sunday, March 13, 2011

Abortion and my own thoughts


John Harvell
English 110U 
February 12, 1997

A-B-O-R-T-I-O-N
and my own thoughts

      What would it be like to die so young and so fragile?  What would it be like to kill something so young and so fragile?  Abortion, in my definition, is the taking of a life.  Now it is hard for me to sit here and type this paper when I know good and well that if my daughter or wife were ever raped I would want whatever was inside of them out -- immediately.  I think that to take the life of an unborn just because the couple involved were too lazy to use contraceptives, is immature and quite horrid.  In this informative paper, you as a reader will come to understand the facts on abortion and then understand where I stand.  

      Let us begin.  According to US Abortion data provided in 1995 by Planned Parenthood, there were 1.8 million first trimester abortions, 180 thousand second trimester abortions, and about four thousand required Hysterotomies.  Now according to these figures we, as the United States, killed/aborted 1,984,000 fetus'.  Sure we could keep down the increase in our population at this rate, but where would we be emotionally?  Speaking from a "my" point of view, I wouldn't get to far.  I enjoy children profusely and thinking that there are 1.9 million children less in the world every year sends shivers down my spine.  But I guess you may say that it is not my place to speak.




      There are fewer deaths per million abortions than per million births according to the Planned Parenthood survey of 1995.  There are nine deaths per million abortion procedures and sixty-three deaths per million births.  Both complications and the death rate rise with the age of the fetus.  I can understand that these facts portray a much better picture for abortion than carrying to term, but what about the pain that the fetus will feel?   According to pro-choice physicians they believe that a certain connection, synaptic, necessary to perceive pain, for the fetus, is not formed until the twenty-eighth week of pregnancy.  Others who are pro-life believe that the fetus can feel pain as early as the seventh week.  But even though these facts by Planned Parenthood show a better side to abortion as well, nothing can compare to the guilt of the "Post-traumatic abortion syndrome" right?  Wrong. 

      According to Dr. Paul Sachdef, professor of social work at Memorial University in Newfoundland, Canada, long term guilt or depression was rare in the seventy in-depth interviews that he conducted of women ages eighteen to twenty-five, single, and white.  These classifications of the women interviewed represented the largest group of women seeking abortions.  He also found that two-thirds of the women used contraceptives rarely or not at all.  Three-fourths of the women thought they would not become pregnant.  Almost eighty percent "felt relief and satisfaction" soon after the abortion.  He also found the elective abortion is much less traumatic for the parent/s than an elective adoption.  June Scandiffino disagreed with the good doctor's findings.  She believes that Post-traumatic abortion syndrome does not set in until perhaps seven years after the abortion.  I would like to believe both findings but I find that it would be hard not to feel some loneliness and some guilt immediately after having an abortion. What do you think?

      My English professor gave me this assignment, to investigate a subject of interest that we know little about but have wanted to learn more about and then present it, but I kind of cheated on it.  I know a good amount about abortion, emotionally, but I don't know a lot of the facts.  I know what the main points are and that I always hated when someone would bring up the subject of abortion and then ask my opinion.  I have a real split opinion.  As for the percentage of abortions dealing with rape and incest -- go for it.  If my daughter or wife were ever subject to either one of these I probably would consent to having an abortion and then going out and killing the bastard who did it.  As for the percentage of abortions that concentrate around the health of the fetus/ and finding that the fetus has an irreparable disease or body malfunction that would mean bringing a neurologically impaired child, or a deformed child into this world than I would, as well, consider an abortion.  There are probably several other "percentages" that once confronted with them I would change my feeble mind.

      When you hear about all the bombings or incidents of arson on abortion clinics you, well at least I do, wonder what those people involved with those incidents would do if confronted with something of the magnitude of rape or something.  I think a lot of those minds would change.  Because I know that if I found that I was the product of rape, I probably would want to kill myself.  You?  My final statement is this, "I am usually pro-life and if there is anyway of keeping and supporting a healthy child than do it.  For new life comes around only once in a while."

Abortion


Points of View 

      It is nearly impossible anymore to find someone who doesn't have an opinion
about abortion, and probably a strong opinion at that. Yet the endless debates on the topic
usually go nowhere, leaving the opponents even more committed to their positions and
the open-minded observers confused. Both sides make a good case. An unwanted child is
a pitiful thing, and the attendant social problems (single motherhood, financial
destitution, child neglect, and urban overcrowding, to name just a few) do not have easy
solutions. On the other hand, the thought of terminating something that, if left to run its
natural course, would ultimately result in the birth of a human being gives all but the
most hard-hearted among us cause for serious introspection.


      One reason the debate goes nowhere is that each side focuses on a different topic.
We make no progress because we are not talking about the same thing. The
pro-abortionist prefers to discuss choice, and to dwell on all of the social problems
inherent in an unwanted child. The anti-abortionist is interested primarily in protecting
the life of the fetus. In simple terms, the pro-abortionist focuses on a woman's rights and
the anti-abortionist focuses on a fetus' rights. Though interrelated, these are basically
different topics.




      Though neither side realizes it, there is actually much more agreement than
disagreement between the opposing views. The majority on both sides would agree that
social problems like child neglect and urban overcrowding are serious issues. Most
would also agree that the life of a child is a precious thing that deserves the full
protection of the law. There would even be nearly universal agreement that it is a
woman's exclusive right to make decisions concerning her body. So where's the
disagreement? The entire complex issue comes down to one question:  Is the fetus a
person? If you believe it is not a person, then it is simply part of the woman's body and
subject to her exclusive control. From this point of view, any attempt to diminish that
control is a cruel infringement upon a woman's rights. If, however, you believe the fetus
is a person, then you are obligated to protect it, even to the point of delimiting the actions
of the woman carrying it. For you, the suggestion that this issue is a matter of personal
choice is like saying that whether or not a parent kills a two-year-old is a matter of
personal choice.


The goal of these pages is to examine the abortion debate from several perspectives,
focusing on the question of when the fetus' life as a person begins. Toward that end I
have divided my presentation into four areas:  History, Medicine, Law, and Bible. History
provides insight into how other people and cultures have approached this issue. Medicine
discusses scientific evidence relating to the topic. Law considers how the Constitution
bears on this debate and the role of the court in it. Bible examines the teachings in this
area of one of the fundamental moral guides for Western culture. Throughout each of the
specific areas I have endeavored to honestly reflect views from both sides. But I make no
pretense of being unbiased. No one who spends any time considering this issue can be
truly impartial. Instead I admit my position freely, but try to avoid letting it cause me to
misrepresent the alternatives. If you feel that I have missed something significant, please
let me know. I hope to refine the content of these pages over time to make them more
useful. 

A Method to Memory


The other night I was sitting at home in my room watching the Rockets game, and my phone begins to ring.  I answer "Hello", and I hear this frantic voice that I recognize as my friend Mandy's.  Mandy is a nervous wreck, she has a big bio-chem test in the morning and can't seem to remember a thing.  I ask her what kind of information she has, and she tells me she has notes and her book.  Now being the nice guy I am, and having just completed learning about memory in my Intro to Psych class, I turned off the T.V. and told her I'd help her learn to memorize things.




      The first thing I told her about was a method called rehearsal.  I explained that rehearsal involved repeating the information time after time to keep it from fading from her short term memory, or STM.  She was a bit confused so I simplified it for her.  I reminded her of the other night when she was looking for the number to Pizza Hut in the phone book, and when she found it she started repeating over and over until she got to the phone and could dial it.  She was astounded that she was doing this all along and didn't even know it.  I then explained another short term memory method known as chunking.  She cringed and thought I was talking about the keg party the other night, but I explained that chunking involves taking a large number or word and breaking it down into smaller pieces that could be remembered easier.  I also told her that she could chunk together the first letters of a phrase to make it more accessible to her memory retrieval system.  I gave her the example of the New York Stock Exchange, or N.Y.S.E.  That helped her a lot, but she was concerned whether or not she would remember it all for the final, so I told her the more rehearsing she did, the deeper she would commit the information to memory.  She was so happy, she told me she had to go and study for this test.  I had never heard someone so excited to study.

      About a week later Mandy came up to me after psych class and told me she got an A on her test.  She said she owed me and she took me out to lunch.  She even told me that she remembered almost everything she studied and she would do well on all her tests thanks to me and my Intro to Psych class.

38 Assisted Suicides


The Washington Post
38 Assisted Suicides
September 2-8, 1996


    
     Picture yourself in this situation.  You go to the doctor for a routine physical.  You
look fine.  You feel good.  All those exhausting workouts at the gym are finally starting
to pay off and you actually stuck to that low fat, high vitamin diet you're doctor
recommended.  You have never felt better.  You are essentially the epitome of a healthy,
fit human being.  Then, out of nowhere, you are diagnosed with a disorder of the nervous
system accompanied by chronic fatigue syndrome.  The illness is permanent and there is
no cure.  It will only progress and worsen with time, and all you can do is wait.  What
would you do?
     If you were 42-year-old Judith Curren, a nurse and mother of two small children,
you'd be in close contact with the infamous suicide assessor, Dr. Jack Kevorkian, a.k.a.
"Doctor Death," discussing your "options."  However, according to an editorial published
in The Washington Post, entitled "38 Assisted Suicides," many people believe that when
it comes to matters such as life and death, there are no options.  The decision to live or
die is made by God.  Judith Curren didn't agree.  With the assistance of Dr. Kevorkian,
she died and the retired pathologist presided at his 38th assisted suicide, fairly confident
that he will not be prosecuted or even suffer public disapproval.




     Many of the people who have sought out Dr. Kevorkian have been terribly ill and
suffering, with no hope of long-term survival.  Their stories offered examples that built
public sympathy for this cause.  But from the beginning, even among observers who
believe that the desperately sick should be given help to die, there have been questionable
cases.  For example, a woman in her fifties allegedly suffering from early Alzheimer's
disease was fit enough to play tennis with her adult son shortly before dying.  Another-
said to have had a painful, progressive illness-was found to be free of disease by the
county medical examiner.

     The article argued this point, "Is it in any way merciful, compassionate, or 'healing' (a
favorite word of Kevorkian fans) to assist in the suicide of a middle-aged woman who is
tired and depressed and married to a man whom she recently accused of attacking her
and who then delivers her to Dr. Kevorkian?  Pain is controllable.  Depression and
fatigue can be ameliorated by drugs.  Violent husbands can be prosecuted and divorced.
Suicide in such a case is unreasonable.  A doctor's help in that course is unconscionable."
     I had mixed feelings on this editorial because I take into consideration both sides of
the argument.  On one hand I understand Judith Curren's decision.  I can imagine what it
must feel like to wake up perfectly healthy and have your whole life in front of you, and
in the next minute be told you have an incurable disease and that it's going to eventually
kill you.  Living with that thought alone would be too much for me.  Here's a woman that
did everything right.  It just doesn't seem fair that she will never see her children grow up,
she will not be able to continue her career in nursing and help save other's lives, she will
not be around when the scientists celebrate finding a cure for the disease that claimed her
life.  In many ways, this woman has suffered enough.  Why prolong the inevitable and
possible pain and suffering that will escalate with time?  As humanitarians, we should
want to put this woman out of her misery.

     But fortunately or unfortunately, there is another side to us.  One that wants to be
strong and hold on for just a little bit longer.  One who believes they will be the first
cured when science makes another medical breakthrough.  A side that wants to raise it's
children instead of watching over them.  I believe, for most people, this stronger, more
powerful side will conquer death and reinstate hope.  After all, life is the most valuable
gift we have, and there shouldn't be any two sides to that.

14 Elements of a Successful Safety & Health Program


Element 1: Hazard Recognition, Evaluation and Control.
Establishing and maintaining safe and healthful conditions required indenifing hazards,
evaluating their pontential effects, developing ways to eliminate or control them and
planning action priorities.This process is the essence of successful  safety and health
management.

Element 2:Workplace Design and Engineering
Safety and health issues are most easily and economically  addressed when facilities,
processes and equipment are being designed. Organizations must incorporate safety
into workplace design, production processes and  selection.They also need to evaluate
and modify or replace exisiting processes, equipment and facilities to make them safer.
We explore how the design and function of the workplace can complement safety and
health goals, minimize exposure to hazards and promote safe practices.

Element 3: Safety Performance Management
As in all areas of operations, standards must be set for safety performance. They should
reflect applicable regulatory requirements, additional voluntary guidelines and best business  practices. We describe how managers, supervisors and employees
can be made responsible and held accountable for meeting standards within their
control. We look at how job performance appraisals can reflect performance in safety
and health, as well as in other areas.

Element 4: Regulatory Compliance Management 
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Mine Safety and
Health Administration (MSHA) and state safety and health agencies establish
and enforce safety and health regulations.Other agencies, such as the Environmental
Protection Agency, also issue and enforce regulations relating to safety and health
in the United States. We discuss key aspects of international regulations in the European
Union, Canada and Mexico. Staying informed about and complying with regulations
are essential goals of safety and health programs.We also look briefly at conducting regulatory compliance inspections.

Element 5: Occupational Health
Occupational health programs range from the simple to the complex. At a minimun,
such programs address the immediate needs of injured or ill employees by providing
first aid and responce to emergencies. More elaborate medical services may incude
medical surveillance programs and provision for an in-house medical capability.
In addition, some companies are beginning to focus on off-the-job safety and health
through employee wellness and similar programs.


ELEMENT 6: Information Collection
Safety and health activities, including inspections, record keeping, industrial hygine
surveys and other occupational health assessments, injury/illness/incident investigations
and performance reviews, produce a large quantity of data. Safety and health professionals must collect and analyze this data. Small incidents often provide early
warning of more serious safety or health problems. Complete and accurate records
can be used to identify hazards, measure safety performance and improvement, and
through analyses, help identify patterns.

ELEMENT 7: Employee Involvement
Design and engineering controls are limited in their ability to reduce hazards.
Companies now understand that their real assets are people, not machinery, and
they also realize that employees must recognize their stake in a safe and healthful
workplace. As employees become more involved in planning, implementation and
improvement, they see the need for safer work practices. Solutions to safety and
health problems often come from affected employees. We look at how employees
can contribute to safety and health objectives through safety committees and teams.

ELEMENT 8: Motivation, Behavior, and Attitudes
Movtivation aims at changing behavior and attitudes to create a safer, healthier workplace. This elements describe two general approches organizations use
to motivate employees and stresses the role that visible management leadership
plays in changing unsafe or unhealthy behaviors and attitudes. It also describes
three motivational techniques: communications, incentives/awards/recognition and
employee surveys.

ELEMENT 9:Training and  Orientation
New and transferred employees must become familiar with company policies and
procedures and learn how to perform thier jobs safely and efficiently. The use of
on-the-job, classroom and specialty training can contribute to a successful safety
and health program. A complete program includes hazard recognition, regulatory
compliance and prevention. The training is reinforced through regular follow-up
with both new and veteran employees.




ELEMENT 10: Organizational Communications
Effective communication within the organization keeps employees informed about
policies, procedures, goals and progress. We see how to spread the word about
safety and health programs inside the company through the use of bulletin board
notices,newsletters, meeting and other devices. Effective two-way communications
between employees and managers is critical as is publicizing safety and health
information in the community.



ELEMENT 11:Management and Control of External Exposures
Todays safety and health programs must address risks beyond the organizations
walls. We described the kinds of contingency plans and "what if" worst-case scenarios
that are part of planning for disasters, contractor activities and product and other
liability exposures.

ELEMENT 12:Environmental Management
Environmental management often requires a complete program of its own and is
addressed in a separate volume, 7 Elements of Successful Environmental Program,
available from the National Safety Council. Many companies, however, address environmental issues along with safety and health as part of their comprehensive
programs. We discuss the minimum that an environmental program should cover,
including compliance monitioring and contingency planning for emergencies. More
aggressive environmental management incorporates pollution prevention and an
active role in environmental improvement.

ELEMENT 13:Workplace Planning and Staffing
Safety and health considerations are important when planning for and staffing the
companys work force. We consider issues such as work safety rules, employee
assistance programs and requirements resulting from the American with Disabilities
Act.

ELEMENT 14:Assessments, Audits, and Evaluations
Every organizations needs tools to measure conditions, monitor compliance and
assess progress. A variety of evaluative tools can be used to meet the needs of
the organizations, including self- assessments, third-party assessments and voluntary
regulatory assessments. Numerous resources are available for conducting assessments
audits and evaluations, including the companys own trained internal staff, consultants
and OSHA and other agencies.
















The Continuous Improvement Model is a framework for safety presented in the
National Safety Councils Agenda 2000 Safety Health Environment Program.
The 14 Elements are the materials that fit within the framework. Continuous
improvement is a process-oriented business approach that emphasizes
the contributions people make to long-range, permanent solutions to problems.
It is the cornerstone of total quality management. Applying the process that forms
the Contiinuous Improvement Model requires understanding causes before
designing solutions.Improvements may be dramatic or incremental. In any event,
the model helps ensure that occur regularly.


The Continuous Improvement Model




 Phase 1: Management Commitment and Involvement

The first phase is to make a management commitment and to gain managements
involvement. Companies with successful safety and health programs have active
senior management participation. Without this active involvement, mid-level
managers and front-line supervisors tend to ignore safety and health as an issue.
Senior management signals its commitment by stating a position that is
communcated through clear, unambiguous policy and implementation procedures.
When management supports the 14 Elements, it also indicates a broad commitment to the issues include in the reviews.  It then supports continuous improvement in safty and health through ongoing involvement, allocation of resources and feedback.